Hemant Mehta, the man behind The Friendly Atheist, Secretary General of the American Humanist Association, Roy Speckhardt and as well as blogger and author Greta Christina reject accusations that the atheist movement has been hijacked by alledged “Social Justice Warriors”. Foto: Even Gran

Key American humanists scoff at “SJW”-accusations against the Reason Rally

Leading atheist blogger Hemant Mehta and AHA-head Roy Speckhardt reject claims that the disappointing turnout at The Reason Rally 2016 was due to a hijack by “Social Justice Warriors”.

Fri tanke - nettavis for livssyn og livssynspolitikk
Human-Etisk Forbund

Publisert:

Sist oppdatert: 13.06.2016 kl 09:38

On June 4. Everything was set for The Reason Rally in Washington DC. The event was going to be the largest mass gathering of humanists, atheists and secular people in US history, but the turnout was disappointing.

In the comment sections, criticism has come from people who believe the reason for this is that the American secular movement has been hijacked by so-called "Social Justice Warriors" (SJWs) – a derogatory expression aimed at people who dogmatically keep labelling legitimate opinions and attitudes as racist, discriminatory, hateful or misogynistic.

“The difference between an SJW and an activist... an activist tries to get a ramp added to a building for easier wheelchair access. The SJW tries to get the stairs removed because they might offend people that can't use them,”
. writes one of the critics, user TheSharpeful, inThe Friendly Atheist comment section.

The reaction against the Reason Rally is akin to the noise in the American atheist/skeptic’s movement that arose for example in February when Richard Dawkins was declared unwanted from a skeptic’s conference in New York, the noise around the term “Atheism+” or the somewhat older “Elevatorgate”-case.

The “anti-SJW”-crowd has reacted to the Reason Rally's highlighting of subjects like LGBTQ Equality, fight against Climate change denial and Women’s Reproductive Rights, instead of focusing on the core of the movement; atheism, secularism and criticism of religion.

In addition, the organizers issued rules of conduct that made critics draw parallels to ongoing controversies around the term "safe zones" and giving "trigger warnings".

Hemant Mehta: - The criticism is not valid

One of America's most popular atheist bloggers, Hemant Mehta, (The Friendly Atheist) does not think it's a valid point that the social issues the Reason Rally highlighted this year, such as LGBTQ Equality and Climate change denial, may be divisive.

He believes these social issues help accentuate a clear distinction between religious and secular values.

“When we talk about LGBT rights in this country, the opposition comes from religious people. Climate change denial is rampant among religious people who believe God created the planet. And obviously, the pro-life crowd is overwhelmingly religious. So if we want religion out of politics, it makes sense for atheists to push for civil rights for LGBT people, to call for science-based policies, and to make sure women have a reproductive choice. That's how we put atheism in action”, he writes in an email to Fritanke.no.

Mehta believes this is a completely natural way to put atheism out in life.

“What else would we do? Urge the government to promote atheism? Of course not. We can urge people to become atheists all we want, but at the end of the day, what other people believe doesn't really matter. All that matters is how they put those beliefs into practice. These social issues are natural extensions of our godlessness", Mehta writes.

He adds that those who criticize Reason Rally for having been “hijacked by Social Justice Warriors," ignore the fact that many of the speakers who were actually invited, simply would not have been invited if “Social Justice Warriors” (a hypothetical crowd who would aptly be described in such a way, that is) were to decide.

“Many of the speakers who are regularly criticized by the "SJW" crowd, were invited, people like Richard Dawkins (whose health issues kept him away from the Rally, though he was invited), Lawrence Krauss, Dave Rubin, Maryam Namazie and Penn Jillette. If “SJWs” really “hijacked” the Rally, those are not the speakers I'd expect to see invited”, Mehta writes.

He also thinks the reactions have a great deal to do with who promotes them.

“Surely, if Richard Dawkins had spoken at the Rally, he would have argued that we need to fight for better science education in the U.S. I can't imagine anyone would say "Stick to atheism and stop talking about politics”, Mehta comments.

He emphasizes that the rules of conduct that have been criticized, are common at events of this kind.

Mehta also has some critical feedback to the organizers, but of a different type.

“I am among those who criticized the Rally for not focusing enough on atheism, but not because the speakers talked about these social issues. My concern is that they didn't invite enough people who could bring together atheists (like popular atheist YouTubers, podcasters and authors). They were too focused on inviting big-name actors and singers”, Mehta writes.

He has analyzed six possible reasons for the disappointing turnout. Read Mehta’s analysis here.

Speckhardt: - Baseless allegations

Also the Secretary General of the American Humanist Association (AHA), Roy Speckhardt, is dismissive when Fritanke.no ask whether The Reason Rally has fallen victim of a "SJW coup".

“The accusations that the Reason Rally was hijacked by a social justice agenda are baseless. Just because a number of movement leaders care about social justice, and some of the speakers addressed social justice issues in their remarks, doesn't mean that reason, secularism, and non-theism weren't the focus; they still definitely were the focus”, he writes in an email to Fritanke.no.

Speckhardt refers to surveys among humanists and atheists in the United States, and feel confident that less than five percent of atheists in general, and less than one percent of those identifying as humanists are “swayed by the extreme voices of the men's rights activists and those who see racial justice and LGBTQ rights as outside our purview.”

“Over the years, the more the American Humanist Association addressed such issues, the more we grew. The movement isn't splitting since that suggests a large division. But we may have a very narrow racist/sexist/homophobic splinter that most of us won't be sad to see removed”, Speckhardt says.

His main analysis of why the Reason Rally in 2016 had a lower turnout than the one in 2012, is that the novelty has worn off.

“The recent event wasn't viewed as the historic, once in a lifetime, event that the first one was”, Speckhardt writes.

Organized from out of a hole in six months

The ateist blogger and author Greta Christina launches another explanation for the lower turnout;

In December 2015, just about six months before the event should take place, the Board decided to dismiss the Executive Director of the Reason Rally and appoint a new one, she explains.

“The Reason Rally was greatly mismanaged and under-publicized until December 2015, when it was taken over by Lyz Liddell. Liddell didn't just have to organize a massive national event from the ground up, she had to dig her way out of a hole. (…) By all reports she did an amazing job turning it around, but she had six months to do it in. As I said on Facebook yesterday: Anyone analyzing Reason Rally attendance who doesn't start with that is talking out of their ass”, she writes.

Siste nytt i English Vis flere

Key American humanists scoff at “SJW”-accusations against the Reason Rally

Key American humanists scoff at “SJW”-accusations against the Reason Rally

– The worst enemy of religion is the Internet

– The worst enemy of religion is the Internet

It was difficult, but this summer "The Friendly Atheist" Hemant Mehta, the man behind one of America's best known atheist blogs, chose to terminate his teacher job.

«Growth of the religiously un-affiliated not linked to personal faith»

Refutes secularization of the US:

«Growth of the religiously un-affiliated not linked to personal faith»

«They enjoy being obnoxious», American sociologist Claude Fischer says about the new atheists. He also claims religious faith in the US is not declining. (Sept. 16, 2014)

Personvern og datalagring

Lagring og logging av data

Ved å besøke dette nettstedet lagres noen tekniske data om din internettforbindelse og nettleser. Disse data kan kategoriseres som følger:

Informasjonskapsler

Dette nettstedet bruker cookies/"informasjonskapsler" for å forbedre funksjonalitet og brukeropplevelse.

Vis mer info

Teknisk info

Når du besøker et nettsted vil webserveren logge noe teknisk info som din IP-adresse, hvilken nettleser du bruker og tidspunktet for hver gang du forespør data fra serveren, altså når du klikker på en intern lenke og laster en ny nettside eller tilhørende data som skrifttyper, bilder, ulike script som kreves for at nettsiden skal fungere.

Disse dataene spares bare en viss tidsperiode for å kunne utføre feilsøking og feilretting i systemene, og deles aldri med avisens ansatte eller tredjepart.

Brukerinformasjon

Vi lagrer noe informasjon om deg som bruker. På dette nettstedet lagres ingen sensitiv informasjon, men enkel kontaktinformasjon som du gir fra deg når du oppretter en brukeronto eller kjøper tjenester i nettavisen vil lagres i våre databaser. Dette er nødvendig for å kunne levere tjenestene til deg. Disse dataene slettes når du sletter din brukerkonto.

Hvem lagrer vi data om?

Vanlige besøkende/lesere:

Hvis du besøker dette nettstedet uten å ha registrert en brukerkonto eller abonnement, lagres følgende data om deg:

Innloggede brukere og abonnenter:

Hvis du velger å opprette en brukerkonto og/eller abonnement på nettavisen, vil også følgende informasjon lagres om deg:

NB: Etter at data er slettet vil de likevel kunne spares i inntil 180 dager i backuper. Backuper lagres med høy sikkerhet og begrenset tilgang, og er nødvendig for å kunne drive feilsøking og ivareta brukerenes og datasystemenet sikkerhet.

Dine rettigheter:

Som bruker av dette nettstedet kan du kontakte avisen for å få dine data utlevert og/eller slettet.

Har du en brukerkonto/abonnement, kan du logge inn i din brukerprofil og laste ned dine lagrede data, samt slette din brukerkonto og tilhørende data når som helst.

Du kan også slette alle lokale data i din nettleser. Fremgangsmåten for dette varierer mellom ulike nettlesere og enheter.

Anbefaling: Ved å benytte deg av EU-tjenesten YourOnlineChoices.com kan du selv til en viss grad styre hvordan ulike annonseleverandører sporer deg, samt lese mange gode tips til hvordan du kan beskytte deg selv. Åpne YourOnlineChoices.com i et nytt vindu.

NB: Enkelte systemkritiske data som finnes i for eksempel webserverens logger vil ikke kunne slettes på forespørsel, men disse slettes automatisk etter kort tid iht informasjonen ovenfor.


Hvis du trykker AVVIS vil ingen informasjonskapsler lagres i din nettleser og ingen data om deg logges i våre databaser. Det betyr også at vi ikke kan vite om du har godkjent eller ikke, slik at du vil se denne advarselen på hver side du besøker. Teknisk informasjon (webserverlogger) vil likevel lagre din IP-adresse og nettleserinformasjon, men dise slettes fortløpende som beskrever ovenfor.

Vi tar ditt personvern på alvor

Ved å besøke dette nettstedet vil noen data bli lagret. Dette er informasjon som er nødvendig for å kunne tilby tjenesten til deg.

Vi lagrer så lite data vi kan, så kort tid som mulig.

Mer informasjon